The one overriding reality surrounding Butler’s proposed decorative lighting project is that the state and federal governments are not awash in money.

Instead, the two higher levels of government are mired in huge deficits — and, in the case of the federal government, a national debt spiraling virtually out of control.

The condition of federal and state spending is relevant regarding the local lighting project because Butler officials are hoping for Community Development Block Grant or other funding to help pay for the new lights and their installation.

City officials can always hope there is — and even travel to Harrisburg and Washington to present details of the project and ask for financial considerations — but they have to be honest with themselves about the prospects for the needed money at this time.

That’s why local officials should compile several options for the project — each with a different cost figure — as a means for trying to get one or both of the governmental levels to release some money for what’s envisioned.

From the standpoint of state and federal spending, the project isn’t large. However, the project isn’t a shoo-in for a state or federal infusion of funds when those two levels of government face so many financial challenges of their own.

The situation would be more promising if the city had a thriving business or wealthy individual capable of and willing to finance the work. Perhaps the city should, after plans are finalized, offer to “sell” the lights. Groups, organizations, businesses or individuals could “buy” a light and be recognized by a plaque attached to the light standard.

“Selling” the lights might result in the project being completed more expeditiously. The “sale” of the lights would be consistent with the fact that Butler County will be paying the cost of replacing six lights in front of the courthouse.

No funding option should be overlooked, and the city should try to think of unique ways to encourage others to help in this city attempt at beautification, as well as safety.

Although 48 dilapidated lamps have been removed, the project envisions 62 new lamps, since it’s the city’s intent to add lamps between Brady and Penn streets.

Presumably because of the project’s anticipated cost, Councilman Richard Schontz Jr. indicated that the project would have multiple phases.

But that approach might not necessarily be needed if the city aggressively pursues state and federal money, and if people, businesses and groups step forward on behalf of what is envisioned.

Councilwoman Kathy Kline was correct when she said “this project is more than just buying decorative lights and plunking them in.” This is an important planning exercise as well as a challenging exercise from the standpoint of money.

The multiple phases to which Schontz referred must not translate into multiple years.